Congress mandating oh mojo gay dating

Posted by / 28-Sep-2020 08:53

Congress mandating

(c) .—A State may not issue a motor vehicle operator’s license for the operation or use of a dedicated highly automated vehicle in a manner that discriminates on the basis of disability (as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U. (c) .—In each provision of the report prepared under subsection (b) identifying the text of a regulation from a safety standard, a test procedure, or a method for determining compliance with a safety standard, the Director or designated entity shall include— (A) an alternative reference to an automated system that is suitable for assessing, through an objective test procedure, the compliance of a dedicated highly automated vehicle, or of a highly automated vehicle operating in automated mode, with the safety standard; or (B) a determination that— (i) the relevant regulatory text applies to features of the motor vehicle equipment that are only necessary for the performance of a dynamic driving task by a human driver; and (ii) no alternative reference to an automated system is practicable.

“(2) .—The collection by the vehicle of automated driving system performance information and incident and crash data— “(A) to record the occurrence of malfunctions, disengagements, degradations, or failures; “(B) to aid in the analysis of the cause of any issues described in subparagraph (A); “(C) to enable efforts to work with other entities to address data recording and sharing; and “(D) with respect to event data recorder information, that complies with the collection and sharing requirements under the FAST Act (Public Law 114–94).(b) .— “(1) Compliance with a motor vehicle safety standard prescribed under this chapter does not exempt a person from liability at common law.“(2) Subject to subsection (b)(3)(A), nothing in subsection (b)(3) shall exempt a person from liability at common law or under a State statute authorizing a civil remedy for damages or other monetary relief.”. 12102))..—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director or other designated entity, after consultation with stakeholders, shall prepare and submit to the Secretary a report that identifies each provision, requirement, specification, or procedure in a safety standard with a reference to features of the equipment that— (1) are necessary only for the performance of the dynamic driving task by a human driver; (2) specify a location or reference point within a vehicle by reference to the position of a human driver; or (3) serve a purpose of providing information to, or receiving input from, a human driver engaged in performing the dynamic driving task.Such best practices shall address the physical accessibility of highly automated vehicles and human-machine interface accessibility through visual, auditory, or haptic displays or other methods.The working group shall include representatives from national organizations representing individuals with disabilities..—Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Committee shall submit a report containing recommendations of consensus-based, feasible, and objective standards to the Secretary for potential rulemaking governing highly automated vehicles that meet the need for motor vehicle safety..—The Secretary shall consult with the Committee, as appropriate, on highly automated vehicle safety matters, including the development and implementation of relevant policies, programs, and rulemaking..—The Secretary shall regularly provide recommendations to the Committee regarding the agenda of the Committee and areas in which Committee activity would benefit and complement Department of Transportation efforts..—Nothing in this section may be construed to restrict the authority of the Secretary under section 30111 of title 49, United States Code. 272(e))..—The Secretary may inspect any cybersecurity plan developed by a manufacturer under this subsection to enable the Secretary to decide whether the manufacturer has complied, or is complying, with this chapter or a regulation prescribed or order issued pursuant to this chapter..—The Secretary may, by notice and comment rulemaking, establish a requirement that manufacturers subject to subsection (b) develop a summary of its plan that is suitable for public disclosure, as appropriate..—The Secretary may work cooperatively with manufacturers of highly automated vehicles and automated driving systems to incentivize manufacturers to voluntarily adopt a coordinated vulnerability disclosure policy and practice in which a security researcher privately discloses information related to a discovered vulnerability to a manufacturer and allows the manufacturer time to confirm and remediate the vulnerability— “(2) to discover and mitigate cybersecurity vulnerabilities in highly automated vehicles or automated driving systems that present a risk to motor vehicle safety (as defined in section 30102 of title 49, United States Code).

congress mandating-81congress mandating-50congress mandating-29

One thought on “congress mandating”