Accomodating multiple learning styles bookworms dating friendship

Posted by / 01-Jan-2020 13:22

This spectrum is very similar to the Jungian scale of Sensing vs. In the horizontal Processing dimension, people will take the results of their Perception and process it in preferred ways along the continuum between: The experimenter, like the concrete experiencer, takes a hands-on route to see if their ideas will work, whilst the reflective observers prefer to watch and think to work things out.

Divergers take experiences and think deeply about them, thus diverging from a single experience to multiple possibilities in terms of what this might mean.

In a moral panic, believers claim that there are stark differences between groups of people and that only moral people care about these differences. The team is just finding excuses to take shortcuts. ” So I fight back, maybe by debating learning styles or just resisting others’ ideas.

” Maybe you’ve heard that from a classroom presenter (I have).For example, imagine that I believe in learning styles and I’m a member of a team on an elearning project. One way to avoid the backfire effect could be to frame your disagreement in a way that doesn’t threaten the believer’s moral position.I notice that no one is planning any narration, so I say earnestly, “Don’t forget the auditory learners! That way, you can keep their emotions from rising and clouding their thinking.These resources link to or summarize research that debunks learning styles: The myths that put people into special categories, such “visual learners” or “digital natives,” have a powerful emotional appeal. I’ve certainly received some impassioned responses, and I know that some of you have, too.In Urban Myths about Learning and Education, the authors suggest that these myths could be a type of moral panic.

accomodating multiple learning styles-38accomodating multiple learning styles-68accomodating multiple learning styles-6

” Someone else says, “Oh, that’s all been debunked.” I’ve never heard that before. For example, you might first acknowledge the believer’s compassion and then offer alternatives that meet even more important needs, so agreeing with you won’t harm their position as someone who cares about the learners.